Those that have been proclaiming victory for ACNA in regard to the PMM at General Synod are, in my estimation, at best too hopeful and at worst misguided. Read it carefully. In true English fashion, it does not state affirmation of ACNA but of ACNA’s desire. Moreover, it does not say that ACNA is an [...]
Archive for the ‘TEC’ Category
ACNA PMM at CoE General Synod
Posted in ACNA, Anglican Communion, Archbishop of Canterbury, Church of England, General Synod, TEC, tagged ACNA, Archbishop of Canterbury, Church of England, General Synod on February 12, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
Bishop of Durham, N.T. Wright, responds to ++Cantuar’s ‘reflection’.
Posted in Anglican Communion, Archbishop of Canterbury, Ecclesial issues, General Convention, Lambeth Conference, N.T. Wright, TEC, TEC Conflict, Uncategorized, tagged Anglican Communion, Archbishop of Canterbury, Bishop of Durham, Future of Anglicanism, GC09, General Convention, Instruments of Unity, N.T. Wright on July 30, 2009 | 3 Comments »
I have just one question for Bishop Wright regarding the following: and he warns against speaking ‘in apocalyptic terms of schism and excommunication’. He also speaks of the ‘twofold ecclesial reality’ as a ‘possibility’ in the ‘middle distance’. (ii) The Reality: But, as he himself has indicated, key decisions have been made (obviously not yet [...]
Matt Kennedy’s take on the ABC’s Statement
Posted in Anglican Communion, Archbishop of Canterbury, General Convention, TEC, TEC Conflict on July 29, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
Short, concise and clear. Definitely a contrast to the ABC’s statement. Read it all below.(Hat tip: StandFirm) My Take on the ABC’s Statement Wednesday, July 29, 2009 • 5:53 am Greg pointed out that I’m one of the only SF writers who has not yet published an analysis of the ABC‘s statement. I told him [...]

